The revolutionary nature of Wiki is the ability for any reader of any article to edit that page right now. Wiki is the enabling technology that is making Wikivoyage into a really great travel guide. Wikivoyagers know that we need to keep Wikivoyage open and available to make it succeed. We depend on the distributed effort of the millions of people on the Internet to get high-quality, up-to-date and reliable articles.
However, in some circumstances, it may be necessary to protect a page on Wikivoyage. When a page is protected, it can only be edited by administrators. This is an extreme measure and shouldn't be taken lightly. Whenever possible, we prefer to counteract abusive actions by some users with the ability of other users to edit a page.
- The text of the page must remain verbatim on the site. An example is the Full text of the Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 license, which is a legal document not open to interpretation by Wikivoyagers.
- A policy page has legal ramifications for the Wikivoyage project. Some policy is important to the continued existence of the project and the livelihoods of Wikivoyagers. If these pages are repeatedly compromised, they should be protected.
- Non-human spambots occasionally hammer away creating pages that are not and can never be valid Wikivoyage articles (eg. Talk:Bangalore/; note the slash at the end). Such pages can be permanently protected from creation.
Reasons for temporary full protection include:
- An out-of-control edit war is underway. If two or more Wikivoyagers are involved in an extended edit war over a page and are unable or unwilling to discuss the issue on the appropriate talk page, an administrator can use the page protection feature to declare a cooling-off period on the article until contributors are willing to talk out their differences. Administrators should not protect a page if they are personally involved in the edit war; they should ask another administrator to do it instead. It's preferred that the participants be cautioned before such a step is taken, rather than simply pre-emptively protecting the page; actual protection of the page should really be a last resort.
- A page is subject to repeated vandalism. This is a special case of the edit war; if a user is repeatedly and systematically vandalizing a page, it should be protected until the user gets their head straight, or they wander away, or they get banned.
- A page causes a security risk for Wikivoyage. Hopefully the MediaWiki software is robust enough to deal with simple security attacks through the Wiki interface, but if in some case it's not, administrators should take the step of protecting the page.
Pages can also be semi-protected, allowing established users to edit, but blocking anonymous users:
- A few high-visibility and/or high-risk pages like the Main Page and the Project:Local spam blacklist are semi-protected to stop drive-by vandalism and spamming.
See Project:Protected pages for the full list.
Before or immediately after protecting a page, the administrator should note the protection on the accompanying talk page, and add a link on the protected pages page, with a justification for why the page was protected. Other Wikivoyagers can and should comment on the protect action there, but it's not the place for discussing the particulars of an edit war.
If the protect action isn't in the above list of reasons, it should be strongly defended and the reason should be added to the above list.
A page should be unprotected as soon as it's feasible. When a page is unprotected, a note to that effect should be put on the protected pages page.